<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content is King, or Links are King: What&#8217;s Your Money On</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/</link>
	<description>Tips to Earn Money Online and Blogging tips Search engines news webmaster guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 23:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoogleLady</title>
		<link>http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/comment-page-1/#comment-19483</link>
		<dc:creator>GoogleLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/#comment-19483</guid>
		<description>From my experiences testing out this issue openning new sites. I came with a solution:

When you start a page with content, how a spider will know that this site exists? Let&#039;s see if you add it on Google manually. It will take a lot of time, or as Google explained somewhere in the Adwords guide, &quot;If your site is new and you are using adwords we &quot;may&quot; add it in our index&quot; (something like this). 

But try it yourself if you have a blog (which it seems Google spiders it more than a normal website) link to your new site and wait 24/48 hours and you will see that your new site will be on their index typing: yourdomain.com

All I mentioned Index because you first need to be indexed and then ranked. To be ranked well is definitevely a &quot;MUST&quot; to have backlinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experiences testing out this issue openning new sites. I came with a solution:</p>
<p>When you start a page with content, how a spider will know that this site exists? Let&#8217;s see if you add it on Google manually. It will take a lot of time, or as Google explained somewhere in the Adwords guide, &#8220;If your site is new and you are using adwords we &#8220;may&#8221; add it in our index&#8221; (something like this). </p>
<p>But try it yourself if you have a blog (which it seems Google spiders it more than a normal website) link to your new site and wait 24/48 hours and you will see that your new site will be on their index typing: yourdomain.com</p>
<p>All I mentioned Index because you first need to be indexed and then ranked. To be ranked well is definitevely a &#8220;MUST&#8221; to have backlinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chiller</title>
		<link>http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/comment-page-1/#comment-19480</link>
		<dc:creator>Chiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/#comment-19480</guid>
		<description>Oh ok sorry then, I was referring to the part where you describe the three options and did not really factor in your &quot;links are queen&quot;-statement.
Regarding your answer: Do you think that a link needs to be spread even if it has excellent content to be ranked well in search engines?
It of course would be linked automatically by others, but let&#039;s assume the hypothetical case that it wouldn&#039;t be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh ok sorry then, I was referring to the part where you describe the three options and did not really factor in your &#8220;links are queen&#8221;-statement.<br />
Regarding your answer: Do you think that a link needs to be spread even if it has excellent content to be ranked well in search engines?<br />
It of course would be linked automatically by others, but let&#8217;s assume the hypothetical case that it wouldn&#8217;t be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoogleLady</title>
		<link>http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/comment-page-1/#comment-19334</link>
		<dc:creator>GoogleLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/#comment-19334</guid>
		<description>Chiller, I didn&#039;t say that the site can succeed with no links. On the contrary, I believe that Unique content is the king and links are the queen.


 If there is a site with execellent content/ unique content and new content with one good backlink will be enough to be spread. Internet is really wild!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chiller, I didn&#8217;t say that the site can succeed with no links. On the contrary, I believe that Unique content is the king and links are the queen.</p>
<p> If there is a site with execellent content/ unique content and new content with one good backlink will be enough to be spread. Internet is really wild!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chiller</title>
		<link>http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/comment-page-1/#comment-19329</link>
		<dc:creator>Chiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/#comment-19329</guid>
		<description>I think your thought experiments are a little off-key in that you seem to require that there a no links at all to your new site. Then how is anybody (including search engines) going to find your site?

It would be interesting to see what happens to a site that is linked only from 1 source and has excellent, new content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your thought experiments are a little off-key in that you seem to require that there a no links at all to your new site. Then how is anybody (including search engines) going to find your site?</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see what happens to a site that is linked only from 1 source and has excellent, new content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoogleLady</title>
		<link>http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/comment-page-1/#comment-19322</link>
		<dc:creator>GoogleLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/#comment-19322</guid>
		<description>You can give an example here, Googlelady.com have a pagerank 6 with top commentators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can give an example here, Googlelady.com have a pagerank 6 with top commentators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Sinfield</title>
		<link>http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/comment-page-1/#comment-19319</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Sinfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/#comment-19319</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of opportunity to get exposure and back links by making it into other blogs &#039;top commentors&#039; sections! Some of them are Page Rank 5!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of opportunity to get exposure and back links by making it into other blogs &#8216;top commentors&#8217; sections! Some of them are Page Rank 5!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/comment-page-1/#comment-19286</link>
		<dc:creator>arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlelady.com/364/content-king-links-king-money/#comment-19286</guid>
		<description>I think this info is fantastic considering the fact that i have been looking for information from the wrong ( black hole) sources. am new in this fun game and i trully believe that what i have read today is of massive value to me in my infancy. thankx a zillion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this info is fantastic considering the fact that i have been looking for information from the wrong ( black hole) sources. am new in this fun game and i trully believe that what i have read today is of massive value to me in my infancy. thankx a zillion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

