When do sitemaps become doorway pages?
January 11, 2008
I found an old thread about a user asking when do sitemaps become Doorway pages. Is an interesting thread because after I read it I came with “new” projects that I want to use with some domains that are sitting there doing nothing. It might be interesting to you as well to understand more about doorway.
Ok - so I decide to make a sitemap at the root level of my Funky Widgets site to make sure the bots find and spider every page. Keep it simple - plain text and links. No problem with that, right? It’s been accepted practice for years - and I’m a nice guy for helping the spider (and users) out.
Google’s Webmaster Guidelines
“Offer a site map to your users with links that point to the important parts of your site.”
But then I think “Wait a minute - every page on my site links to this sitemap, and it’s getting a stack of PR, and it’s just going to waste?”
So I title the page “Funky Widgets Site Map”, put “Funky Widgets” in the metas, in body text, H1 tags etc etc.
Lo and behold - I’m number 1 in the SERPS for “Funky Widgets”
THEN I realise there are about 150 links on this “sitemap” page so I should split them up into sections:
Google’s Webmaster Guidelines
“If the site map is larger than 100 or so links, you may want to break the site map into separate pages.”
So I do.
“Funky Blue Widgets Site Map”, “Funky Red Widgets Site Map”, “Funky Yellow Widgets Site Map”.
And I’m ranking well for every one of them.
So my question: When do sitemaps become doorway pages? Simply because they’ve been optimised for a search term? Redirect or cloak? Or does relevance determine it?
Nothing wrong with them from what I can tell. The problem is with the general vagueness of the term “doorway pages” that’s come about over the years, and the checkered history of how these pages have been used.
Sitemaps apart… the original idea of a doorway page was a well-focussed optimized page that linked into a site and attracted search.
I’m not clear whether, with the early doorways, the site didn’t link back to the doorways, but ultimately that’s where the idea was taken… so someone browsing your site couldn’t accidentally navigate to such a page if it didn’t fit well into the overall scheme of the site.
Questions then came up about how many doorways a specific search engine might allow. This was pre Google and pre PageRank, but there may have already been some linking considerations in operation that we were unaware of.
Variations on doorways came to include machine-generated pages seeded with keywords, and eventually cloaked doorways. Eventually, some years back, AltaVista came down hard on WebPosition Gold generated doorways, causing all sorts of turmoil, and throwing the name “doorway” page into general disrepute.
Then along came Google with PageRank. Even when they’re not cloaked and not machine generated, the one-way pages don’t do well on Google. Such one-way pages have been called “orphan” pages, and some commentators believe that these orphans are penalized by Google simply because they’re perceived as doorways.
I think that orphan pages don’t do well because they don’t have any PageRank, something which the algo probably anticipated. Efforts to get PageRank to these pages came to include hidden links, and, when hidden links became widespread, Google began to penalize for them.
I’ve always considered any page on a site to be a potential doorway page, in the sense that it’s designed to attract traffic. Over the years there was a perception that the better integrated into the site the doorway was, the less likely it was to cause trouble and the better it did.
As you’ve observed, a page that’s well integrated into the rest of the site gets good PageRank from the site. Such pages are great candidates for optimization, and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that.
Site maps are excellent candidates for optimization anyway… I like to keep enough text between each link that they feel like a mini-directory. An ODP page, or a Yahoo page without the ads, is a good model.
Want One of the Cheapest and Affordable Hosting?
What Next?
Digg It
Save This Page
Sphinn It
Stumble it!
Favorite This Post

Posted in 


content rss
January 12th, 2008 at 10:11 am
That’s a really useful history of ‘doorway pages’ and I’m sure it’ll clarify things for a lot of your blog’s readers…it’s so difficult to know what is and isn’t accepted and I’m sure for website newbie’s it’s even harder. Thanks for the clarification. Emma.