Comments on: It is Worth to Focuss on MSN Search Ranking?

By: Alan Johnson

Alan Johnson — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:38:53 +0000

The issue is basically the same as comparing AdWords to AdCenter. Sure, AdCenter traffic does tend to convert better but they can’t compete with AdWords in terms of volume.

Alan Johnson

By: Little Guy Network

Little Guy Network — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:39:23 +0000

I get most of my traffic from google and thats what im focusing most on. But maybe MSN can be worth trying.

By: sir jorge

sir jorge — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:52:56 +0000

MSN gives me a lot of diverse traffic, and the bounce rate is low, so msn still helps a little, even if it isn’t google

By: steven wilson

steven wilson — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:48:22 +0000

I check all my sites,and stats with the popular search engines weekly.I find the majority of my traffic comes from google.So I put most of my interest in google.

steven

By: Collin DeRuyck

Collin DeRuyck — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:04:48 +0000

The nice thing is MSN will not kill your rankings for selling link, they don’t want people doing it but they will not hurt your site for it. And I think every search engine is worth the time. The reason for that is blogs get most of there traffic from other blogs not search engines…..the more search engines the better.

By: Stephan Miller

Stephan Miller — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:05:15 +0000

I have an issue with even tracking live hits, but haven’t investigated because I have always gone after Google hits and just let other search engines come along for the ride. It seems that Google analytics doesn’t even count Live hits. I know this because I have it and another stat program going at the same time.

Live hits are actually overtaking Google on my blog, but all I get in my stats is one term, not a whole phrase and like I said, Google Analytics says I get barely any hits from Live.

I am not going to focus on Live. Just thought this was interesting.